I'm Tess. I'm in my forties, I read the studies so my friends don't have to, and I'll tell you what's real, what's marketing, and — because everyone asks — where a dozen of us actually order.
Same supplier for all of us. Not one problem to report. (The code is my husband's name — long story, short version here.)
Shop with 10% offEvery guide on the internet is organised by molecule, which is useless if you don't already know which molecule you're looking for. Pick the thing that's actually happening to you.
NAD+, MOTS-c and the IV drip industry. What's actually been tested — and the expensive version that has zero outcome trials.
Read my notesDSIP, CJC/ipamorelin, and why every 'sleep peptide' figure you've read traces back to eight men.
Read my notesTopical vs. injectable copper peptide, settled — and who wrote most of the studies.
Read my notesThe one compound with real perimenopause data, the microdose question, and what 'what do I add' actually turns up.
Read my notesPT-141, Selank, and the difference between 'approved' and 'approved for you.'
Read my notesHow many draws in a vial, how long it lasts, what a week actually costs. Numbers, not opinions.
Open the calculator230 papers. Zero clinical trials. The 'human safety study' enrolled two people. Still the most-ordered vial in the chat.
Read my notesWhat I've actually watched happen in a group of women who research together — boxes, seals, lot numbers, and who keeps ordering. Not reviews. On purpose.
Read the notesThe questions I asked my doctor, and the one interaction no clinic protocol mentions.
The listThree things for each: what I looked at, what's actually been studied in women, and what my friends and I concluded. Tap around.
NAD+ (oral, and the IV drip everyone's aunt is doing), MOTS-c, and the growth-hormone secretagogues that get sold for 'clarity.'
What's actually been studied in womenOral NR/NMN reliably raise NAD+ markers in blood and are well tolerated — 33 human trials say so. What they do to how you actually feel is, in the review's own words, 'often null.' The IV version has no outcome trials at all. MOTS-c has never been given to humans in a completed trial. A 2025 trial of tesamorelin shrank waists and did nothing for cognition.
Still ordering. Nobody's switched suppliers. Nobody's stopped reading.
Batch COA linked on every product. Not one issue to report across a dozen of us.
Shop with 10% offAffiliate link. Read the ZestyRat page for the joke and the fine print.
DSIP, CJC-1295 with ipamorelin, and the 'sleep stack' every clinic sells.
What's actually been studied in womenDSIP was the one peptide the FDA advisory committee voted against in July 2026. Ipamorelin's only human data comes from eight healthy men per dose. No human trial of CJC/ipamorelin for sleep exists — in either sex.
Still ordering. Nobody's switched suppliers. Nobody's stopped reading.
Batch COA linked on every product. Not one issue to report across a dozen of us.
Shop with 10% offAffiliate link. Read the ZestyRat page for the joke and the fine print.
Topical GHK-Cu (serums), injectable GHK-Cu (the 'more bioavailable' pitch), and blends marketed as Glow.
What's actually been studied in womenTopical copper peptide is a reasonable, low-risk cosmetic with a long safety record — and most of the glowing reviews are authored by a man who owns a copper-peptide skincare company. Injectable GHK-Cu has zero published human trials. Women lose roughly 30% of skin collagen in the first five years after menopause, and nobody has tested GHK-Cu in that population.
Still ordering. Nobody's switched suppliers. Nobody's stopped reading.
Batch COA linked on every product. Not one issue to report across a dozen of us.
Shop with 10% offAffiliate link. Read the ZestyRat page for the joke and the fine print.
Tirzepatide and semaglutide (the GLP-1s), 'microdosing,' and the endless 'what do I add to my tirz' thread.
What's actually been studied in womenTirzepatide is the only compound on this site with perimenopause-specific data: 2,542 women across the SURMOUNT trials, with a defined perimenopausal subgroup (23% reduction vs 3% placebo). Microdosing has no trial, no definition, and the big studies show the effect is dose-dependent. Compounded copies lost FDA enforcement discretion in 2025.
Still ordering. Nobody's switched suppliers. Nobody's stopped reading.
Batch COA linked on every product. Not one issue to report across a dozen of us.
Shop with 10% offAffiliate link. Read the ZestyRat page for the joke and the fine print.
PT-141 (bremelanotide), Selank, Semax, and 'mood support' blends.
What's actually been studied in womenPT-141 is FDA-approved — for premenopausal women, with a label that says it is not indicated after menopause. The effect is modest; 40% of trial participants had nausea and 18% quit. Selank's trials are in diagnosed anxiety disorders in Russia, compared against a benzodiazepine you can't get here.
Still ordering. Nobody's switched suppliers. Nobody's stopped reading.
Batch COA linked on every product. Not one issue to report across a dozen of us.
Shop with 10% offAffiliate link. Read the ZestyRat page for the joke and the fine print.
BPC-157 (injectable and the oral capsules everyone sells), TB-500, and the 'Wolverine stack.'
What's actually been studied in womenBPC-157 has about 230 papers and not one indexed clinical trial. The study passed around as its human safety data enrolled two people. Oral BPC-157 — the most-sold form — has never been studied in a human. TB-500 borrows its credibility from a different, full-length molecule.
Still ordering. Nobody's switched suppliers. Nobody's stopped reading.
Batch COA linked on every product. Not one issue to report across a dozen of us.
Shop with 10% offAffiliate link. Read the ZestyRat page for the joke and the fine print.

Here's the bit in my group chat. The website has a rat in the name and looks like it was designed for a guy who calls his garage 'the lab.' It was very clearly not built with a woman in her forties in mind. And every single one of us orders from it anyway.
Not because it's cute. Because it's the one thing in this whole category I trust completely. A dozen women, the same supplier, and I am still waiting for a story. No missing box. No cracked vial. No seal that looked wrong. No COA that didn't match the lot on the label. I check. We all check.
So when the newest member of the chat asks 'where do you order from,' the answer comes back in about four seconds, from six people, and it's the same word. That's the joke. It's also the review.
Yes, that's a man's name. It's my husband's — he set up the account, I write the site. Long story, same 10% off.
Affiliate link — I earn a commission at no cost to you. It hasn't changed a single sentence on this site.
These are not reviews and they are not evidence. They're what's actually happened in a group of women who research together, worded by me. The only claims here are about boxes, seals and lot numbers — on purpose.
The friend who said she'd 'just get one vial to look at' has reordered more times than anyone. She still reads every COA.
Someone made a spreadsheet of lot numbers and purity results. It has tabs. It has colour coding. We have never once needed it, which is the point.
Two of them asked their doctors first. Both were told 'I can't advise on that.' Both went home and read more. Neither switched suppliers.
The most-asked question in the chat is not 'does it work.' It's 'did yours come yet?' The answer is always Tuesday.
Not one of us has switched. Not once. In a category where a third of vials fail testing, that's the only review that means anything to me.
Every new person gets the same welcome: the disclosure, the 'talk to your doctor,' and a link. Same link. Every time.
Nobody is named, nobody is photographed, and nothing here is a health outcome. If you want the part that is evidence, that's what the symptom pages are for. Read the longer version →
Clinics aren't lying to you. They're bundling a prescriber, labs and follow-ups into the number. Research-grade is the molecule and nothing else — you carry the sourcing risk yourself, which is exactly why the supplier matters more when you go this route, not less.
Run your own numbersThe question nobody answers in plain numbers. Put in the vial size, the amount per draw and what you paid, and it does the arithmetic. Research math only — it recommends nothing.
This is arithmetic, not advice. It doesn't know you, your history or your medications, and it isn't suggesting an amount of anything. For research planning and budgeting only.
If ZestyRat is the one that looks like it was built for someone else and works for all of us, Amino Club is the one that looks like it was built for us — soft branding, clean packaging, ISO 17025 third-party COAs, US shipping. It's the group chat's second vote, and a couple of the women prefer it for exactly the reasons you'd guess. It's number two for one reason: ZestyRat has never given me a story to tell.
Affiliate link. You'll be asked to confirm you're a researcher at their door; that's them, not me.
Two suppliers on this whole site. Both tested, both disclosed, both ordered from by real women I know. No list of twelve 'top vendors' I've never used.
Sourcing info gets traded privately in this world because nobody publishes it plainly. I'm publishing it plainly.
No. Nothing is sold here, there's no consult and no plan waiting at the end. I write what I read, I link two suppliers with affiliate links, and I say so on every page. The disclosure has the details.
The suppliers I link sell research materials, labelled as such, and I write about them that way: what's been studied, in whom, and what wasn't. I don't tell anyone what to put in their body and I'm not qualified to. What a dozen curious women do with their reading is their business and their doctor's.
Because it's the one thing in this category I trust completely, and when I trust something completely I say so. A dozen of us, same supplier, no story to tell. Here's the whole bit.
That's a doctor question, and it's a better one than most people realise. Oral estrogen blunts growth-hormone signalling in the liver, which is directly relevant to an entire category of what's sold. I wrote down the questions I asked mine.
An advisory committee voted in favour of six peptides for the compounding list — against the FDA's own scientists, and DSIP was rejected. It is advisory only. Nothing became legal to compound that day, whatever the headlines said. Start here has the plain-English version.
Because it's my husband's. He's the one who set up the affiliate account with ZestyRat, and honestly the one who got me reading the studies in the first place. The site is mine; the code is his; the 10% is yours. The long story is short.
Tess. It's a pen name; the rest is real. My husband is the Shaun in SHAUN10. About me.

Somewhere in my forties my body changed the rules and forgot to send the memo. When I went looking for something solid on peptides, I found two things: studies I needed a dictionary for, and beautiful websites that all ended at a 'book a consult' button.
I wanted the thing in between. Plain English. What's been tested, what hasn't, what it costs, who actually checks the vials — and the negative results, because nobody prints those. So I started reading, then I started taking notes for my friends, and then the notes got long enough to be a website.
I won't tell you what to do. I'll show you what I found and trust you to decide. You're perfectly capable of reading the evidence yourself; most of the internet seems to have decided otherwise.
What I'm reading, what changed price, what the group chat is talking about — and the things that turned out to be nothing.